Skip to main content

A measure of success

Abstract

Cell and Bioscience is on track to receive its first Impact Factor in mid-2013. What is the role of the Impact Factor as a measure of a journal’s success?

A thought provoking commentary was published recently that proposes the use of several metrics to predict the future H-index of a scientist and accordingly the likelihood of his/her “success”[1]. Using a dataset that encompasses 3,085 neuroscientists, 57 Drosophila researchers, and 151 evolutionary biologists, the authors collated and analyzed history of publication, citations and funding. Based on inputs that include current H-index, the number of published articles, the years since first publication, the number of published papers in “prestigious” journals, and the number of distinct journals in which the papers are published, the authors constructed an algorithm (http://klab.smpp.northwestern.edu/h-index.html) with which they claim reasonable success in predicting a researcher’s future H-index. This methodology is an intriguing endeavor. Time will tell whether it has the same value as, or better value than, some of the stock charting programs used by Wall Street investment advisors to direct investment dollars into various equities.

For journal editors, there is unfortunately no innovative proposal to predict a journal’s future success. In 2011, the Society of Chinese Bioscientists in America (SCBA) launched Cell and Bioscience[2, 3] as the flagship journal of the Society. The intent was to establish a high quality, highly visible, Open Access journal for the Society and for the at-large international bioscience community. One reason there was a need for Cell and Bioscience is the rapid rise of bioscience and biomedical research in Asia[4]. Indeed, a 2011 Royal Society Report predicted that by 2013, the global share of total scientific articles published from China will outpace articles from the United States[5]. Cell and Bioscience is aptly positioned at the nexus of burgeoning scientific interactions between Asia and the rest of the world.

As of this writing, Cell and Bioscience has been publishing for nearly two calendar years. The journal has been tracked and indexed by PubMed (http://www.Pubmed.gov), Scopus (http://www.scopus.com), and was recently added for tracking by ISI Thomson-Reuters to its Web of Science, science citation index. What this means is that every article in Cell and Bioscience since its launch in January 2011 has now been tracked by Web of Science, science citation index and that the journal will receive its first Journal Citation Report, Impact Factor in mid-2013. The Impact Factor is a measure of the citation frequency of the articles published in a journal and is often used as a proxy to reflect the standing of a journal in its field. There are certain misconceptions about what an Impact Factor number means or does not mean[6]. However, it should be noted that garnering an Impact Factor is a first step for a new journal to be measured against its established peers. In this respect, the editors and editorial board of Cell and Bioscience intend to compete vigorously and successfully in this and other measures of journal excellence.

References

  1. Acuna DE, Allesina S, Kording KP: Future impact: Predicting scientific success. Nature. 2012, 489: 201-202. 10.1038/489201a

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shi YB: The right journal for the right time - Cell & Bioscience. Cell Biosci. 2011, 1: 1. 10.1186/2045-3701-1-1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeang KT: If you organize, they will join. Cell Biosci. 2011, 1: 2. 10.1186/2045-3701-1-2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jeang KT: The rise of bioscience in the East. Retrovirology. 2010, 7: 106. 10.1186/1742-4690-7-106

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. The Royal Society: Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. 2011, 1-102. London: The Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jeang KT: Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and Retrovirology: is it time to individualize citation metrics?. Retrovirology. 2007, 4: 42. 10.1186/1742-4690-4-42

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The opinions expressed in this editorial represents KTJ’s personal views and do not necessary reflect the views of his employer, the National Institutes of Health, USA. Research performed in KTJ’s laboratory is funded by intramural funds from the NIAID, NIH. The author thanks Yun-Bo Shi for inviting this editorial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuan-Teh Jeang.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeang, KT. A measure of success. Cell Biosci 2, 35 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-3701-2-35

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-3701-2-35