Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Cell & Bioscience and BioMed Central.

Open Access Editorial

A measure of success

Kuan-Teh Jeang

Author Affiliations

The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

Cell & Bioscience 2012, 2:35  doi:10.1186/2045-3701-2-35


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.cellandbioscience.com/content/2/1/35


Received:11 October 2012
Accepted:11 October 2012
Published:16 October 2012

© 2012 Jeang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Cell and Bioscience is on track to receive its first Impact Factor in mid-2013. What is the role of the Impact Factor as a measure of a journal’s success?

Editorial

A thought provoking commentary was published recently that proposes the use of several metrics to predict the future H-index of a scientist and accordingly the likelihood of his/her “success” [1]. Using a dataset that encompasses 3,085 neuroscientists, 57 Drosophila researchers, and 151 evolutionary biologists, the authors collated and analyzed history of publication, citations and funding. Based on inputs that include current H-index, the number of published articles, the years since first publication, the number of published papers in “prestigious” journals, and the number of distinct journals in which the papers are published, the authors constructed an algorithm ( http://klab.smpp.northwestern.edu/h-index.html webcite) with which they claim reasonable success in predicting a researcher’s future H-index. This methodology is an intriguing endeavor. Time will tell whether it has the same value as, or better value than, some of the stock charting programs used by Wall Street investment advisors to direct investment dollars into various equities.

For journal editors, there is unfortunately no innovative proposal to predict a journal’s future success. In 2011, the Society of Chinese Bioscientists in America (SCBA) launched Cell and Bioscience [2,3] as the flagship journal of the Society. The intent was to establish a high quality, highly visible, Open Access journal for the Society and for the at-large international bioscience community. One reason there was a need for Cell and Bioscience is the rapid rise of bioscience and biomedical research in Asia [4]. Indeed, a 2011 Royal Society Report predicted that by 2013, the global share of total scientific articles published from China will outpace articles from the United States [5]. Cell and Bioscience is aptly positioned at the nexus of burgeoning scientific interactions between Asia and the rest of the world.

As of this writing, Cell and Bioscience has been publishing for nearly two calendar years. The journal has been tracked and indexed by PubMed ( http://www.Pubmed.gov webcite), Scopus ( http://www.scopus.com webcite), and was recently added for tracking by ISI Thomson-Reuters to its Web of Science, science citation index. What this means is that every article in Cell and Bioscience since its launch in January 2011 has now been tracked by Web of Science, science citation index and that the journal will receive its first Journal Citation Report, Impact Factor in mid-2013. The Impact Factor is a measure of the citation frequency of the articles published in a journal and is often used as a proxy to reflect the standing of a journal in its field. There are certain misconceptions about what an Impact Factor number means or does not mean [6]. However, it should be noted that garnering an Impact Factor is a first step for a new journal to be measured against its established peers. In this respect, the editors and editorial board of Cell and Bioscience intend to compete vigorously and successfully in this and other measures of journal excellence.

Acknowledgements

The opinions expressed in this editorial represents KTJ’s personal views and do not necessary reflect the views of his employer, the National Institutes of Health, USA. Research performed in KTJ’s laboratory is funded by intramural funds from the NIAID, NIH. The author thanks Yun-Bo Shi for inviting this editorial.

References

  1. Acuna DE, Allesina S, Kording KP: Future impact: Predicting scientific success.

    Nature 2012, 489:201-202. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Shi YB: The right journal for the right time - Cell & Bioscience.

    Cell Biosci 2011, 1:1. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. Jeang KT: If you organize, they will join.

    Cell Biosci 2011, 1:2. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Jeang KT: The rise of bioscience in the East.

    Retrovirology 2010, 7:106. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  5. The Royal Society: Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. London: The Royal Society; 2011:1-102. OpenURL

  6. Jeang KT: Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and Retrovirology: is it time to individualize citation metrics?

    Retrovirology 2007, 4:42. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL